Friday 6 July, 2007by Michael Perry
Welcome all to the new era with Simpler Super, or as the government's
recent promotional material points out, Better Super. In many respects
it will be both of these for those 60 and over.
While the focus of some may have been on finalizing contributions or
other SMSF matters, what may have gone unnoticed was a change in the
regulations on spouse contribution splitting to prevent members from
splitting their undeducted contributions into a spouse's super account.
As passed, the new regulations prevent both non-concessional
contributions and co-contributions from being split and directed into a
spouse's super account after 5 April 2007, or where an RSA is involved,
after 30 April 2007.
Trustees are also being put on notice that the new regime requires
SMSFs to lodge Member Contribution Statements annually for all members
including those who make no contributions in the year. Unfortunately
this also impacts those who only receive pension benefits who may be
over 65 and retired permanently or those who are over 75 and ineligible
to contribute further!
If the government believes that requiring trustees to perform this
essentially redundant task improves SMSF integrity and compliance that
belief must surely be misplaced. Unnecessary form filling is hardly
likely to engender a positive attitude to compliance and it beggars
belief that they would require this era of "Simpler or Better Super"!
The government should review this issue and not require members to
report annually on nil contributions. Surely the onus should be on
trustees to report member contributions responsibly and where nil
contributions occur this can be inferred from the fact that no MCS has
been forwarded. As it now stands SMSF trustees are responsible for
additional form filling and dispatch to the regulator when this is
patently unnecessary. It also flies in the face of the streamlining
that will combine regulatory and income tax returns, MCS and the levy
payment in 2007/08 and future years.
Much publicity and anecdotal evidence suggests increases in aggregate
contribution to super in 2006/07. However it is impossible to make
immediate and meaningful estimates of the level of additional
contributions or the motivations behind them. Whether it was the new
regime, the $1 million contribution cut-off date, immediate retirement
considerations, ongoing savings plans or incentives to make
non-concessional contributions to attract the government
co-contribution is not immediately apparent. The budget largesse of
doubling the 2005/06 co-contribution already paid out may have also
inadvertently played a role in attracting end of year savings into
super, which unfortunately will not be doubly rewarded! The
contribution statistics for SMSFs will be released by the regulator
soon and they may throw light on some of the underlying issues.